2026.2.25 Life in jail for Eastern Cape man for beating his drunk girlfriend to death
The Eastern Cape Division of the High Court of South Africa has sentenced a 45-year-old man to life imprisonment for beating his heavily intoxicated girlfriend to death after a night of drinking in October 2024.
The Eastern Cape Division of the High Court of South Africa in Makhanda has sentenced Siyabulela Tshemese, 45, to life imprisonment for the murder of his 34-year-old girlfriend, Amanda Kweyama, whom he beat to death after she became heavily intoxicated.
The court heard that the incident occurred on October 27, 2024.
Eastern Cape police spokesperson Captain Ursula Roelofse said Tshemese and Kweyama had been drinking at a local tavern.
After it closed at about 9pm, they left together.
“According to the accused, the deceased was intoxicated and could not walk any further, and it was also raining,” Roelofse said.
She said that while Tshemese was trying to support Kweyama as they walked, he noticed a group of men approaching. He allegedly left her next to the road and ran home to fetch a stick to defend himself and her.
When he returned, Kweyama was no longer where he had left her. He was told she had been taken to a nearby house.
Tshemese went to the house, where he found Kweyama still heavily intoxicated and unable to walk.
“He carried her and beat her with the stick until he got tired and left her on the roadside until the morning,” Roelofse said.
The following morning, Tshemese was woken by his father and informed that Kweyama had died. He went to the scene and found her dead. He was later arrested.
Tshemese first appeared in the Ugie Magistrate’s Court on October 30, 2024.
Bail was successfully opposed. The matter was transferred to the Makhanda High Court on September 1, 2025.
He remained in custody until 20 February 2026, when he was sentenced to life imprisonment.
Meanwhile, Joe Gqabi District Commissioner Major General Lindelwa Vellem commended the investigating officer, Detective Constable Brian Koitsiwe, and his mentor, Detective Warrant Officer Mboniswa Methuso of the Ugie detectives, for their dedication and professionalism in securing the conviction.
Vellem said the life sentence sends a strong message that crimes of this nature will not be tolerated.
“As SAPS, we remain resolute in the fight against gender-based violence and will continue to ensure perpetrators are brought to justice,” Vellem added.
2026.2.25 Serial rapist Marvin de Klerk sentenced to 25 years for parole offence
A serial rapist has been jailed for 25 years after he was convicted for a rape he committed while out on parole.
Marvin de Klerk, 40, was sentenced to 25 years’ direct imprisonment by the Springbok Regional Court for the rape of a 43-year-old woman.
National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) spokesperson, Mojalefa Senokoatsane, said the conviction and sentence stemmed from an incident that occurred on July 15, 2024, in the small mining town of Nababeep, approximately 20 kilometres from Springbok.
“On the evening in question, the complainant and her friend were at a local drinking establishment when they encountered the accused and his companions.
“Although the groups were separate, the complainant’s friend was acquainted with the accused and engaged him in conversation, expressing surprise at his release from prison.
“Later that night, as the complainant and her friend left the establishment, the friend noticed the accused outside and observed that he appeared to be in possession of a firearm.
“The two women considered reporting the matter at the nearby police station but walked past it, concerned about their state of intoxication,” said Senokoatsane.
However, De Klerk used a window of opportunity to accost the complainant approximately 150 metres from the police station, while she had briefly stepped aside. He approached her from nearby bushes, said Senokoatsane.
“He threatened her with a knife and forced her to undress before raping her. He then fled the scene. The complainant returned home and informed her husband, who accompanied her to the police station.
“In the meantime, the complainant’s friend had already reported the incident. Although there was initially only one police officer on duty and no police vehicle available, additional officers returned to the station shortly thereafter. The accused was identified by name, located, arrested, and subsequently charged with rape.”
Senokoatsane said during the trial, the accused claimed that the sexual encounter was consensual.
“However, under cross-examination by regional court prosecutor Bail Kock, his version was found to be improbable and inconsistent. He failed to explain how consent was obtained and declined to answer further questions.
“In aggravation of sentence, the State proved that the accused has eight previous convictions, including two, for similar offences. Notably, he was on parole for a similar offence at the time he committed this crime,” said Senokoatsane.
A Victim Impact Statement, compiled by court preparation officer Desmond Cloete, detailed the profound emotional and relational harm suffered by the complainant, including strain on her marriage and family life.
The State argued that no substantial and compelling circumstances existed to justify a deviation from the prescribed minimum sentence.
The court rejected the accused’s version and accepted the State’s case beyond a reasonable doubt. He was sentenced to 25 years’ direct imprisonment.
The court further declared him unfit to work with children, unfit to possess a firearm, and ordered that his name be entered into the National Register for Sex Offenders.
2026.2.24 Five Arrested for Alleged ATM Kidnappings in KwaMhlanga and Soshanguve-Case Postponed to 2 March for Bail Hearing
KwaMhlanga, Five people accused of running a kidnapping syndicate that forced victims to withdraw money from ATMs appeared in the local magistrate’s court on Monday, facing serious charges that have raised alarms about safety in communities around Mpumalanga and Gauteng. The group, made up of men and women from different age groups, was remanded in custody after a brief hearing, with the judge setting a date for their bail bid amid an ongoing police probe into their activities.
The Arrests and the Intelligence-Driven Operation
The breakthrough came last Friday when police launched a well-planned takedown based on solid tips. Teams from specialised units in the South African Police Service worked hand-in-hand with private security firms to track down the suspects. This joint effort shows how combining forces can help crack down on organised crime that preys on everyday people going about their business.
Officers swooped in on 21 February, nabbing the five in a swift move that caught them off guard. The operation focused on areas known for these kinds of attacks, where criminals spot vulnerable individuals near banks or shopping spots. Once caught, victims are bundled into vehicles, threatened, and taken to ATMs to pull out as much cash as possible. This method, often called express kidnappings, leaves people traumatised and communities on edge.
What stands out here is the mix of suspects involved. Ages range from 21 to 43, suggesting a group that might have drawn in younger members for specific roles, like scouting or driving. Police believe this was not a one-off but part of a pattern, with multiple incidents linked to them over recent months. By acting fast on intelligence, authorities hope to stop more harm and send a message to others thinking of similar schemes.
Details of the Accused and Charges Filed
The five facing the music are Itumeleng Matlou (30), Tshepiso Tlou (28), Tebogo Sithole (35), Urvin Mosupi (43), and Mbali Loni (21). They stood in the dock together, charged not just with kidnapping but also extortion and other linked crimes. These extra charges come from how they allegedly pressured victims under duress to hand over money, turning a simple abduction into a full-blown financial shakedown.
Kidnapping in this context means grabbing someone against their will, often with threats of violence if they do not comply. Extortion adds the layer of forcing money out through fear. In South Africa, these offences carry heavy penalties, with possible jail time running into decades if found guilty. The group is said to have operated in KwaMhlanga, a town in Mpumalanga known for its rural feel but growing urban issues, and Soshanguve, a bustling township north of Pretoria in Gauteng where crime stats have been climbing.
Investigators are digging deeper, looking for ties to more cases or even bigger networks. They want to know if the suspects had inside info on victims’ bank details or routines, perhaps from watching patterns at ATMs. This kind of crime spikes in areas with high foot traffic, where people might be alone after work or shopping. By charging them with multiple offences, prosecutors aim to build a strong case that covers all angles of their alleged wrongdoing.
Court Appearance and Postponement Explained
On 24 February, the accused made their first court appearance in a packed KwaMhlanga Magistrate’s Court. The mood was tense as family members and locals watched proceedings. The state asked for more time to wrap up key parts of the investigation, like gathering statements from victims and checking evidence such as vehicle records or cellphone data.
The magistrate agreed to push the case to 2 March for a proper bail hearing. This delay is common in serious matters, giving both sides time to prepare. For bail, the accused will need to show they are not a flight risk or danger to the public. The prosecution might argue against it, pointing to the nature of the crimes and the fear they have caused. Until then, the five remain behind bars, a move that has brought some relief to those worried about revenge or more attacks.
This postponement also allows police to strengthen their file. They could add more charges if new victims come forward or if links to other crimes surface. Courts in South Africa handle these cases carefully, balancing the rights of the accused with community safety. For anyone following, the next date is crucial – it could decide if they walk free while awaiting trial or stay locked up.
Understanding ATM Kidnappings in South Africa
ATM kidnappings are a growing worry in many parts of the country, especially in townships and smaller towns where security might be lighter. Criminals often work in teams: one spots the target, another drives, and others handle the threats. Victims are usually picked because they look like they have money, perhaps after using an ATM or carrying shopping bags.
In places like Soshanguve, with its mix of homes and businesses, these attacks happen more at night or in quiet spots. KwaMhlanga, being closer to rural areas, sees similar issues as people travel between towns. Stats show thousands of such incidents yearly, costing victims not just cash but also their sense of security. Many suffer long-term stress, avoiding banks or going out alone.
To fight this, police have ramped up patrols and encouraged people to use apps for banking or travel in groups. Community watch groups help too, sharing alerts on social media. This case highlights how intelligence – tips from the public or surveillance – can lead to arrests. It also reminds everyone to stay alert, like not flashing cash or using well-lit ATMs.
Community Impact and Calls for Action
Residents in KwaMhlanga and Soshanguve have mixed feelings: glad about the arrests but concerned about safety until the group is dealt with. Local leaders say these crimes hurt the economy, as people shop less or avoid certain areas. Families of victims often need counselling, and some push for harsher laws to deter copycats.
Broader efforts include better lighting at ATMs, more cameras, and partnerships between banks and police. Private security plays a role, as seen in this operation, providing extra eyes and tech. For the average person, simple steps like varying routines or using contactless payments can reduce risks.
As the investigation unfolds, more details might emerge about how the syndicate operated – perhaps using stolen cars or fake IDs. This could help prevent future groups from forming. Communities are urged to report suspicious activity, turning public awareness into a tool against crime.
What Happens Next in the Legal Process
After the bail hearing on 2 March, if granted, the accused might face conditions like reporting to police or staying away from certain areas. If denied, they wait in jail for trial, which could take months. The state will present evidence, including witness accounts and any recovered items like phones or vehicles.
Defence lawyers will challenge the case, perhaps questioning how IDs were made or if rights were followed during arrests. Trials like this often draw attention, shining a light on crime trends. A conviction could mean long sentences, serving as a warning. For now, the focus is on justice moving forward without delays.
This case underscores the ongoing battle against violent crime in South Africa, where quick police action and community support can make a real difference. As more facts come out, it might inspire changes to keep everyone safer.
2026.2.24 Accountant in dock over prostitute extortion scheme
A deeply religious 61-year-old who was duped out of hundreds of thousands of rands after an illicit rendezvous with a prostitute in her early twenties decided to go into prayer and reflection before approaching the police in a bid to escape the clutches of an alleged extortion syndicate.
This was the evidence presented in the Gqeberha Specialized Commercial Crimes Court on Tuesday, during the trial of a Pretoria accountant charged with fraud and extortion.
Mulalo Tshitambo faces charges of extortion, fraud, corruption, and defeating the ends of justice.
The accused was allegedly part of a syndicate that duped a Gqeberha businessman, who made use of the services of the prostitute, into thinking that he was being investigated for fraud and rape after his encounter with the woman.
The complainant, whose name is known to Algoa FM News, eventually turned to the police for help after he had already been duped out of more than R700,000.
He met the 24-year-old sex worker at a guesthouse in February 2022, paid for services rendered after their interlude, and left.
During his testimony, the court heard that shortly after he was bombarded by members of a syndicate who constantly demanded money, stating they could make the charges he stood facing disappear.
The complainant was allegedly first contacted by a “Mr Makwena” purporting to be an SAPS Warrant Officer.
He told the complainant that he was being investigated for fraud and rape by a woman who was apprehended by SAPS for having counterfeit currency.
The complainant was informed that the woman alleged that she received the counterfeit currency from him and that he raped her.
Thereafter, he was also duped into making payments to a woman, purportedly a Judge who could assist with making the impending charges disappear.
It is alleged that the so-called Judge is the accused before the court.
According to the complainant, who testified that he is a religious man, he approached the police after first praying about the matter.
His indiscretion weighed heavily on his conscience.
At this point, he had coughed up large amounts of cash from March 2022 to November that same year.
He stated that he also came forward in the hope that what happened to him could serve as a warning to others so that they could avoid falling into the same trap.
During cross-examination, the complainant was questioned about his age and that of the prostitute.
He stated that he is 61 years old and that the woman whose services he used was 24.
Regarding the complainant considering himself a religious person, he was asked whether his actions were those of someone who holds themself in that regard.
To this, he answered: “It was a mistake. I admit it was a mistake.”
The State alleges that R390,500 was paid into an FNB account belonging to Tshitambo.
The corruption and defeating the ends of justice charge pertains to the accused allegedly telling the Warrant Officer, Sergeant Dumisani Ntshanyana, that she wanted to purchase the docket from SAPS for R30,000.
It is further alleged that the accused flew to Gqeberha to strike the deal and that she was arrested after handing Ntshanyana the money.
During his testimony, Ntshanyana said he traced the accused to her workplace at the Department of Labour in Pretoria.
After tracing her through her boss, the pair met at a Nando’s in a mall, where he questioned her about the money in her bank account.
In response to a question by State Prosecutor Wilhelm de Villiers, he said he did not indulge in their chicken during the encounter.
During their meeting, the accused is said to have told Ntshanyana that she first wanted to consult with her attorney before he could take her warning statement, and they agreed to reconvene in three months when he returned to Gauteng, according to his testimony.
He further testified that the accused approached him a month later, offering him R30,000 to make the docket “disappear.”
In accordance with police procedures, a trap was set for the accused, and as part of the entrapment, he first asked for payment of R50,000.
Tshanyana told her that he would be in Gauteng for a workshop and that they could meet, but she allegedly told him that she would fly to Gqeberha to hand him the money.
The trial continues.
—
Naledi Aphiwe apologises to Zimbabweans for a comment she made last year, saying she never intended to disrespect anyone.
South African singer Naledi Aphiwe has publicly apologised for a comment she made a few months ago that drew criticism from Zimbabweans online.
This comes after some Zimbabweans took to social media to remind her of the comments ahead of her performance in Harare scheduled for April.
Naledi responds
In a statement posted on her Facebook page, Naledi said:
“Social media never forgets, and I’ve been reminded of a comment I made a few months ago. I want to address it properly instead of ignoring it,” she said.
“First, I want to make it clear that my words were never meant to disrespect Zimbabweans or come from a place of hate. I understand that intentions don’t always translate well online, and I can see how what I said may have hurt or offended people. For that, I sincerely apologise.”
Naledi owning up and learning from mistakes
The singer acknowledged that she is still learning about the weight of words on social media.
“I am still young and I’m constantly growing, learning, and understanding the weight that words can carry especially on social media,” she posted.
“I don’t claim to be perfect, and when I make mistakes, I believe in owning them and learning from them. This has definitely been a moment of reflection for me.”
She urged the public not to judge her based on one comment:
“Please don’t misunderstand my heart or define me by one comment. It truly wasn’t that deep or rooted in negativity. I respect people from all backgrounds, and I would never intentionally spread hate. I hope we can move forward with understanding and give each other grace. I genuinely wish peace for everyone involved.🤍one love 🤍🫀”
Moving forward
Naledi is still expected to headline Ama2k Fest in Zimbabwe.
Her apology comes amid ongoing discussions on social media about accountability, online behaviour, and the lasting impact of words in the digital age.
Fans and critics alike are watching closely to see how the singer engages with her audience in the lead-up to the festival.
Zimbabweans have resurfaced old comments by Naledi Aphiwe ahead of her expected performance at Ama2k Fest in Harare.
South African singer Naledi Aphiwe is expected to perform in Zimbabwe this April, but social media suggests the crowd hasn’t forgotten what she said last year.
Naledi is billed as one of the headline acts at Ama2k Fest, where she will also share the stage with Scotts Maphuma.
The event is set to take place in Harare, and fans are already talking.
But instead of just celebrating her upcoming performance, many Zimbabweans have taken to social media with reminders.
How a TikTok comment sparked outrage over Naledi
Last May, a simple TikTok exchange sparked unexpected tension.
A Zimbabwean fan, Constance Muzenda, commented on one of Naledi’s posts: “Naledi, please come to Zimbabwe.”
It was polite. Straightforward. Just a fan hoping to see her favourite artist live.
“Go and wait for me there” — Naledi’s reply that didn’t land
Naledi responded: “Hambani niyongilinda khona,” which loosely translates to, “Go and wait for me there.”
She likely meant it playfully. But it didn’t land that way.
Many Zimbabweans felt the comment carried an undertone.
Some interpreted it to mean that most Zimbabweans are in South Africa and should first “go back home” and wait for her there.
Whether that was her intention or not, the internet reacted fast — and harshly.
Social media users accused her of being dismissive. Others warned her that “the internet never forgets” and that one day fate might take her to Zimbabwe.
Social media receipts resurface ahead of Harare show
Now, as news spreads that she is set to perform in Harare, those old screenshots are making the rounds again.
The comment section under posts about her upcoming appearance has quickly turned into a reminder board.
Zimbabweans are reposting the exchange and tagging friends, saying this is the moment they were waiting for.
Zimbabweans demand an apology
Some users say they are still offended and believe she should apologise before stepping onto a Zimbabwean stage.
“I’m yet to forgive her about what she said about us last year, if possible can you please shower her with cans,” wrote @Liberty Muregi.
“We didn’t forget what she said about Zimbabweans thou,” posted @Nonoe Taa.
“She must apologize first, otherwise we coming for her particularly,” commented @cmk CMax.
“She must bring all Zimbabweans with her when she comes… I remember she said they are in S.A,” added @Morley Mai ve Boys.
x1200
—
2026.2.24 High Court sends bread-truck murderer to prison for ‘rest of his natural life’
The Western Cape High Court sentenced Ayanda Dayi to four life terms plus 102 years for multiple murders, robberies, and firearms offences in Cape Town.
The High Court of South Africa: Western Cape Division sentenced Ayanda Dayi to four life sentences and an additional 102 years of direct imprisonment.
The court imposed the sentences after convicting him of multiple violent crimes, including four murders committed in Delft and Du Noon.
Ayanda Dayi court convictions and charges
A circuit court sitting at the Wynberg Regional Court found Dayi guilty on four counts of murder, one count of attempted murder, two counts of robbery with aggravating circumstances, one count of theft, three counts of illegal possession of firearms, and three counts of illegal possession of ammunition.
The court handed down life imprisonment for each murder. It also imposed:
15 years for each robbery with aggravating circumstances
5 years for theft of a firearm
15 years for each count of illegal firearm possession
4 years for each count of illegal ammunition possession
10 years for attempted murder
The court further declared Dayi unfit to possess a firearm.
The convictions relate to a series of killings in Cape Town. In one incident, gunmen attacked victims travelling in a Sasko bread truck while they delivered bread at a spaza shop in Symphony Way, Delft, on 16 May 2024.
Dayi’s violent crimes began months earlier. On 24 January 2024, he and an accomplice fatally shot Eric Yaphi and Elvis Thembelani Cwethiso in Du Noon before stealing their vehicle.
Judge condemns violent conduct
Acting Judge Van Leeve described Dayi’s actions as extremely violent and said he showed complete disregard for human life.
The judge stated that his behaviour demonstrated that he posed a danger to society.
She also noted the prevalence of violent crime in Cape Town and South Africa and emphasised that Dayi had shown no remorse.
The court found substantial and compelling reasons to deviate from prescribed minimum sentencing guidelines.
During sentencing arguments, Senior State Advocate Esna Erasmus stressed the devastating impact of the crimes on victims’ families.
She said the families effectively received their own “life sentences” marked by grief, trauma, and loss.
Erasmus told the court that Dayi had prior convictions, including robbery and rape.
Authorities had released him on parole in 2018. His reoffending while on conditional release, the State argued, demonstrated a clear disregard for the law.
Pattern of violence concerns court
The State argued that Dayi’s crimes reflected planning and deliberation rather than impulsive behaviour.
Within five months, he committed four separate killings.
Prosecutors maintained that no substantial or compelling circumstances justified leniency. T
hey told the court that Dayi’s lack of remorse and repeated violent conduct indicated poor prospects for rehabilitation and a high risk of future offences.
The case followed a coordinated investigation and prosecution led by Senior State Advocate Esna Erasmus and investigating officer Lieutenant Colonel Pretorius.
Authorities credited their work with securing convictions on all charges.
Thirty-three people appeared at the Nelspruit Magistrate’s Court yesterday following their arrest by the Hawks last weekend.
The accused are facing charges of corruption, fraud, and money laundering. Today, five additional individuals were charged and appeared before Magistrate Patrick Morris.
During the court proceedings, the prosecutor, Pranisha Jagganeth, informed the court that one of the accused was unwell. Another accused is wheelchair-bound and requires 24-hour medical attention. A third accused, who is a government employee, has a baby and is breastfeeding. Prosecutor Jagganeth requested the court to prioritise the bail application of the three accused and a total of five accused persons were granted bail.
The magistrate granted the wheelchair-bound accused bail of R5,000, while one service provider was granted bail of R50 000. The State submitted that bail should be set at R50 000. “The accused will not forfeit their bail provided that they appear in court until the matter is finalised,” said Jagganeth.
Magistrate Morris stated that the accused are facing a Schedule 5 offence, which means they must remain in custody until the court decides otherwise.
“It will be in the interest of justice to consider those who require medical attention, including the wheelchair-bound accused,” the magistrate told the court. Bail hearings will continue this morning.
On Sunday, February 22, the Hawks arrested government officials and service providers involved in the Mpumalanga Department of Education’s flawed tender worth R114 million during a blitz operation. 21 suspects were arrested in the province, four suspects arrested in Gauteng, one suspect arrested in Limpopo and one suspect arrested in the Western Cape.
“His unexplained re-entry highlights serious failures in border management and movement control systems,” the SIU said.
The Special Investigating Unit (SIU) has revealed that there is no official record showing how Nigerian rapper Prince Daniel Obioma, popularly known as 3GAR, re-entered South Africa before his involvement in a high-profile McLaren crash in Cape Town.
The findings form part of the SIU’s interim report into systemic maladministration within the Department of Home Affairs.
SIU Flags Border Control Failures in 3GAR Case
According to the SIU, Obioma overstayed his visitor’s visa in 2023 and remained in the country unlawfully until he departed.
However, when he later returned to South Africa, there was allegedly no official movement record documenting his re-entry.
Despite that status, he was identified as the driver in the March 2025 McLaren crash.
“His unexplained re-entry highlights serious failures in border management and movement control systems,” the SIU said.
R3 Million McLaren 570S Crash in Sea Point
SurgeZirc SA previously reported that a McLaren 570S, valued at approximately R3 million, crashed at high speed along High Level Road in Cape Town on 1 March 2025.
CCTV footage showed the luxury supercar travelling at significant speed before the driver lost control and slammed into a wall.
The crash unfolded along one of Cape Town’s most prominent coastal routes, drawing widespread public attention.
Investigation, Public Pressure and Prosecution Decision
Police confirmed shortly after the incident that a case of reckless and negligent driving was under investigation.
In the weeks that followed, questions were raised about the pace of the probe. Despite the visibility of the crash and the availability of video footage, no immediate charges were filed, sparking criticism and frustration.
By August 2025, SurgeZirc SA reported that the National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) had decided to prosecute Obioma on negligent driving charges linked to the crash.
The SIU’s latest findings now place renewed focus on border control systems and the handling of immigration records, as scrutiny intensifies over how Obioma was able to return to South Africa without an official entry record.
Investigations into both the administrative failures and the crash case continue.
2026.2.23 Former Zimbabwe President Robert Mugabe’s son faces attempted murder charges in South African court
JOHANNESBURG (AP) — The son of Zimbabwe’s late former President Robert Mugabe appeared in a South African court on Monday with another man to face charges of attempted murder after a shooting at his home in Johannesburg last week.
Bellarmine Chatunga Mugabe, 29, and his co-accused Tobias Mugabe Matonhodze, 33, are also facing two additional charges of defeating the ends of justice and unlawful possession of a firearm.
These are related to the firearm believed to have been used during the shooting when an employee at the Mugabe home in the Johannesburg suburb of Hyde Park was shot on Thursday last week, leading to his hospitalization.
The two accused appeared in the Alexandra Magistrates Court and will appear again on 3 March to make a formal bail application.
According to the police, the firearm used during the shooting has not been found since the two men were arrested last Thursday.
Police identified the person who was shot as the gardener at the home and said there had been an “altercation,” though the motive was still unclear.
Bellarmine Chatunga Mugabe is the youngest son of Robert Mugabe and his second wife Grace Mugabe.
Robert Mugabe led Zimbabwe for 37 years before he was deposed in a coup in 2017. He died two years later in Singapore at the age of 95.
x1200
2026.2.20 Another Uber bike stolen in a jiffy… as polls show confidence in CPF leadership jittery
While the Laudium CPF and their cronies are trying hard to paint a picture that the CPF is making a huge difference in curbing crime in the area, residents are certainly are not being fooled.
Even a recent open poll on the Laudium Sun’s Instagram platform, revealed that 72% of the respondents did not believe that the CPF, under it’s present leadership, was effective in addressing the high crime situation in Laudium.
This follows yet more incidents of crime being reported this week to the Laudium Sun for stats purposes.
In one of the incidents, another Uber Eats delivery rider fell victim to crime. Within 3-4 minutes of the rider leaving his Uber delivery motorbike locked outside and popping in at a tuck shop on Delhi Ave, in Laudium Ext 3, last Monday morning in broad daylight, the motorbike went missing.
The Uber rider, Innocent Dhlakama, formerly from Zimbabwe, now living in Itireleng, told the Laudium Sun that he could not believe his eyes when he returned from the tuck shop to see that his Uber motorbike, a white Big Boy, Reg No: ML81VPGP, was gone, despite him parking the bike just outside the tuckshop.
Innocent added, “It was early on Monday morning at around 8am when I left home for work, on my delivery motorbike, which I hired from my boss to do Uber Eats deliveries. I stopped for less than 5 minutes at a tuck shop on Delhi Avenue to buy some snacks, before I started with my deliveries for the day. I parked my bike right outside the shop and I locked it properly, making sure it was secure before I went inside. After about 3-4 minutes, when I came out of the shop, I was shocked to see that my motorbike was no longer there, where I had parked it. At first I thought maybe I was mistaken about the exact spot where I had parked it, but when I looked properly, I realised that it was gone. I started to panic and began asking people around the area if they had seen anyone taking the motorbike. I was confused and shocked because I had only been inside the shop for a very short time. One Black guy told me that he saw someone take my motorbike towards Itireleng. I strongly suspect that the person I approached about my motorbike, is the same guy who planned with others for my motorbike to get stolen, because I saw a gun on him and he looked dangerous. He was not answering me properly and by his accent I could tell he was South African. The way he responded made me feel very uncomfortable and suspicious. I then immediately reported the theft to my boss, who owns the motorbike. This situation is really hectic for me because I was jobless a few months ago and I was lucky to finally get a job as a delivery driver. Now that the bike has been stolen, I cannot work. Crime in this area is just too high and we fear for our lives all the time. There is no law and order because people can just walk around, even with guns, without being questioned by the police. I hope that the police will recover the motorbike that was stolen, so that my boss can hire me again, as I have a family to support and it is very hard for me to survive without any job or income.”
2026.2.8 SAPS probing link between Mbhense murder, syndicate members’ killings
Police have confirmed that they are investigating whether members of a criminal syndicate implicated in the 2022 murder of Emmanuel Mbhense are assassinating each other.
This follows the killing of three of the twelve suspects in apparent hits.
Mbhense was allegedly tortured and killed by members of the Ekurhuleni Metro Police Department (EMPD) before his body was dumped in a dam.
The details were revealed this morning, hours after former police reservist Wiandre Pretorius took his own life at a filling station in Brakpan, east of Johannesburg.
Pretorius, who was also a person of interest in the Mbhense murder case, survived an attempt on his life outside a house in Boksburg on Thursday.
Police also confirmed that he was a person of interest in the murder of Marius van der Merwe, known as Witness D at the Madlanga Commission.
Police spokesperson Athlenda Mathe says, “The question is, are we dealing with a syndicate that is eliminating each other in relation to the Emmanuel Mbhense murder? So, that is what our detectives are probing. Are we dealing with the syndicate that is eliminating each other in terms of their role and involvement in the murder of Emmanuel Mbhense? So, that is an aspect that we are looking at.”
2026.2.7 Court hears shocking R2 million murder plot against Durban businessman
CALCULATED ASSASSINATION
A CONVICTED murderer has testified in court that he and his accomplice were promised R2 million to kill former ward 90 councillor and businessman Sunil Brijmohan.
In the Durban Regional Court this week, Santure Kirwin Mkhize revealed how what was initially planned as a robbery turned into a calculated assassination.
Mkhize, who pleaded guilty to murder and turned State witness, was testifying during the trial of Brijmohan’s friend, Vikash Brian Sewnath, 46; Vernon Chetty, 26; Farah Moosa, 25; and Sibusiso Ngcobo, 26. All four men, who are charged with murder, pleaded not guilty.
Mkhize, 33, and Al-Barakh Jaleel Van Rooyen, 21, who was also arrested and charged for murder, pleaded guilty and were sentenced to 18 years imprisonment.
They are both witnesses for the State in the trial. Van Rooyen has already testified.
Brijmohan, 46,was shot and killed outside a building site in Amanzimtoti on October 21, 2022.
Mkhize, during his evidence-in-chief, told the court that prior to the incident he knew Chetty, Moosa and Ngcobo, who were all from Chatsworth.
He said he bought car parts from the, and they knew good mechanics.
Mkhize said sometime during October that year, he was sitting in Chetty’s car together with Ngcobo, Van Rooyen and another person named “Ben”.
He said while speaking, Chetty informed them that there was a man he knew in possession of “a lot of money”.
“He said this person must be robbed. We need money. He said he is still going to reveal more detail about it.”
Mkhize said on the morning of October 21, Ben arrived at his place of residence.
“He came there to wake me up. I must go and commit that robbery. I woke up and proceeded to the main house to wake up Al-Barakh. I told him these guys want us to commit the robbery.”
Mkhize said they went to the road and saw two vehicles – one which belonged to Chetty and the other to Moosa. He said together with Van Rooyen and Ben, they jumped into Chetty’s car.
Mkhize said Chetty handed him a firearm.
“He (Chetty) said this person we are going to rob is in possession of 500k (R500 000). I asked how we were going to travel, and he pointed to accused two’s (Moosa) vehicle. I asked accused three (Ngcobo), if accused two was aware of the plan, he said no, he knows we are going to collect money.”
Mkhize said he together with Van Rooyen and Ben jumped into Moosa’s car and followed Chetty’s vehicle to Amanzimtoti.
He said as they were driving Chetty pointed to a construction site with a green net, and then they parked at a nearby garage.
“He parked there, bought some pies and juice. Then we saw a vehicle parked by there (construction site). Accused one (Chetty) told us that was the vehicle with the money.
“We started driving towards there, and I told accused two to reduce speed and park on the side of the road. Accused two and Ben remained inside. Al-Barakh and I stepped out and started walking down the road. When we were very close, we saw the vehicle drive away.
“Al-Barakh received a call from accused one. He said plans have now changed. We must kill this person, Sunil, and we will get R2 million. We realised it was too big. We could not stop this job.
“We had seen a picture of Sunil because we were supposed to rob him. Sunil was in the yard. I signalled to him to come close to us, as a person wanting a job. When he came closer, I asked him, ‘Are you Sunil?’. He said yes. I then did what I did. I shot him three times,” he said.
Mkhize said they then started running towards their getaway vehicle.
“We met up with the car. It was coming towards us. Ben already had the door open for us. Accused two wanted to jump out. He said ‘I am not here to do this’. I produced the firearm and told him to drive on. He kept saying this.”
Mkhize said he, together with Chetty, Moosa, Ngcobo, Van Rooyen and Ben went to Chatsworth.
“As soon as we arrived there, I warned accused two not to speak about what happened and then he ran away.”
Mkhize said they started discussing when they would get paid.
“Accused one said the person who directed us to do this said we must meet at a place in town. Accused one explained that the person killed was abusing his wife and was building a house for his girlfriend.
“On arrival at the place, it was closed. We asked people around us and they said the owner had just been killed. Accused one phoned the man again. He said he was at the scene where the victim was shot and would meet us later,” he said.
Mkhize said they met the person later on in the Jacobs area.
When asked who the person was, he said Sewnath.
“He asked who killed Sunil. I said it was me. He said good job. This person was very abusive to his family and was a bad person. He then took out his phone and made a call. He mentioned the name ‘Divakar’ and said he was sitting with the guys; we have done this job. The person on the phone said give them whatever you have.”
Mkhize said they were given R20 000.
“Accused four (Sewnath) said please take this for now. He said they are still waiting for the insurance to payout, but we will definitely get our money. Al-Barakh and I each took R5 000. The other three (Chetty, Ngcobo and Ben) shared the R10 000.”
Mkhize said the following month they had not received any payment.
“Accused one again called accused four to ask him. He said they were still waiting for the insurance payment. He (Sewnath) then sent R3 000, then R2 000, which we shared.”
Mkhize said they continued to request for their payment.
“We then met with the accused four again in November in Mobeni. I told him ‘see here, we are not playing’. I wanted him to realise we are very serious. I am the one who done the job. He took out his phone again and called that person, Divakar. We heard him saying, ‘Give them whatever you have’. He took out an envelope from his cubby, with R10 000…”
The trial continues.
2026.2.5 Alleged Crime Kingpin Katiso Molefe Appears in High Court Over Murder of DJ Sumbody
South Africa’s criminal justice system reached a significant milestone as alleged crime boss Katiso Molefe made his first appearance in the High Court facing charges related to the November 2022 murder of popular musician and entrepreneur Oupa “DJ Sumbody” Sefoka. The proceedings in the Gauteng High Court in Pretoria mark the culmination of extensive investigations into the high-profile killing that shocked the entertainment industry and exposed connections between organized crime and violence against public figures.
Molefe, who prosecutors allege occupies a senior position within organized criminal networks operating across Gauteng, appeared alongside co-accused individuals facing charges including murder, conspiracy to commit murder, illegal possession of firearms and ammunition, and participation in activities of a criminal enterprise. The State’s case alleges that DJ Sumbody’s assassination was orchestrated as part of criminal business rivalries and conflicts over lucrative entertainment industry territories.
The murder of DJ Sumbody occurred in the early morning hours of November 20, 2022, when gunmen ambushed his vehicle on Woodmead Drive in Johannesburg, opening fire with automatic weapons that killed the musician and one of his bodyguards while leaving his driver critically injured. The brazen nature of the attack—occurring on a major thoroughfare with military-style execution—immediately prompted speculation about organized crime involvement and professional hit squad tactics.
DJ Sumbody, whose real name was Oupa Sefoka, had built a successful career as a DJ, music producer, and businessman whose ventures included nightclub ownership and event promotion. His public profile and entrepreneurial success made him a beloved figure in South African entertainment circles, while also potentially exposing him to the violent underworld that sometimes intersects with nightlife and hospitality industries.
When alleged crime kingpin Katiso Molefe appears in High Court, the proceedings attract intense media scrutiny and public interest given both the victim’s prominence and the allegations about Molefe’s position within organized crime structures. Prosecutors characterize Molefe as a significant figure whose arrest and prosecution represent important progress in dismantling criminal networks that have operated with perceived impunity.
The State’s case, as outlined in court documents and prosecutorial statements, alleges that DJ Sumbody’s murder was planned and executed by individuals operating under Molefe’s direction, with the killing motivated by conflicts over business interests in the entertainment industry including nightclub operations, event promotion, and related ventures where legitimate business intersects with criminal extortion, protection rackets, and territorial control.
Molefe’s defense team has indicated that he intends to plead not guilty to all charges, with his attorneys arguing that the State’s case relies on circumstantial evidence, questionable witness testimony, and assumptions about organizational structures that prosecutors cannot definitively prove beyond reasonable doubt. The defense challenges both Molefe’s alleged senior position in criminal networks and any direct involvement in ordering or facilitating DJ Sumbody’s assassination.
The investigation leading to Molefe’s arrest involved multiple law enforcement agencies including the Hawks (Directorate for Priority Crime Investigation), South African Police Service detectives, and intelligence operatives who worked for months analyzing telecommunications data, surveillance footage, witness statements, and forensic evidence collected from the murder scene and related locations.
Alleged crime kingpin Katiso Molefe High Court appearance follows his initial arrest and bail proceedings in the Magistrate’s Court where prosecutors successfully opposed bail based on flight risk, witness intimidation concerns, and the seriousness of charges that carry mandatory minimum sentences if convicted. The High Court will now hear the full merits of the case through what promises to be a lengthy trial involving extensive evidence and witness testimony.
The murder weapon and ballistics evidence feature prominently in the State’s case, with forensic analysis linking firearms recovered during subsequent police operations to the bullets extracted from DJ Sumbody’s vehicle and the victims’ bodies. Prosecutors will argue that tracing these weapons through possession chains and communications surveillance establishes connections to Molefe and demonstrates his involvement in coordinating the hit.
Witness protection concerns have surrounded the case from inception, with several individuals who prosecutors intend to call to testify requiring security measures due to fears of intimidation or retaliation. The State has applied for certain witnesses to testify via closed-circuit television or behind screens to protect their identities from courtroom observers while still allowing defense attorneys to cross-examine them.
The entertainment industry connection raises broader questions about organized crime infiltration of legitimate businesses and the violence that sometimes erupts when criminal elements compete for control of lucrative sectors. Nightlife venues, event promotion, security services, and related businesses can generate substantial cash flows that attract both legitimate entrepreneurs and criminal enterprises seeking to extort, control, or directly operate these ventures.
When alleged crime kingpin Katiso Molefe appears in High Court, the trial also serves as an opportunity for prosecutors to present evidence about broader criminal organizational structures operating in South African urban centers. The case may reveal patterns of extortion, territorial disputes, and violence that extends beyond this single murder to systemic criminality affecting multiple industries and communities.
DJ Sumbody’s family, friends, and fans have waited over two years for this High Court trial to commence, enduring delays inherent in South Africa’s overburdened criminal justice system where serious cases often require extensive time from arrest through to trial commencement. The family’s presence in court reflects their determination to see justice served and those responsible for the beloved musician’s death held accountable.
Media coverage restrictions and courtroom decorum requirements will govern how proceedings are reported, with judges typically prohibiting filming inside courtrooms and limiting what case details can be publicly disclosed before testimony is formally presented. These protections balance public interest in transparency against fair trial rights and witness protection imperatives.
The trial’s duration remains uncertain but could extend for months given the complexity of the State’s case, the number of witnesses expected to testify, technical forensic evidence requiring expert explanation, and the defense’s right to thoroughly challenge all evidence presented. South African criminal trials often experience delays between testimony dates as courts manage competing case loads and scheduling conflicts.
Convicted perpetrators of murder in South Africa face mandatory minimum sentences of life imprisonment (25 years before parole eligibility) for premeditated killings unless substantial and compelling circumstances justify deviation from this minimum. If convicted on murder charges, Molefe and co-accused face extremely lengthy prison terms that would effectively end their freedom for decades.
The broader implications extend to South Africa’s ongoing struggles with organized crime, violence against public figures, and the capacity of law enforcement and judicial systems to successfully investigate and prosecute complex cases involving well-resourced criminal networks. The outcome will influence public confidence in the criminal justice system’s ability to deliver accountability even when cases involve allegedly powerful criminal figures.
As proceedings unfold with alleged crime kingpin Katiso Molefe appearing in High Court, DJ Sumbody’s legacy as an entertainer who brought joy to countless fans stands in tragic contrast to the violence that ended his life. The trial represents not just an individual prosecution but a test of South Africa’s commitment to confronting organized crime and ensuring that no one, regardless of their position in criminal hierarchies, operates above the law.
A former bank employee accused of stealing more than R1.9 million from his employer is set to return to court today, after he was released on bail in January, following his first court appearance.
The Directorate for Priority Crime Investigation, also known as the Hawks, said Vivian Brink, 60, appeared before the Johannesburg Magistrate’s Court on January 13, 2026, after his arrest a day earlier at his place of residence in Rosettenville.
Brink was arrested on January 12, 2026, on charges of theft and fraud.
According to the Hawks, the alleged offences occurred between January 2014 and November 2017, when Brink was employed as an IT operator at Standard Bank.
“It is alleged that between January 2014 and November 2017, the suspect, who was employed by Standard Bank as an IT operator, manipulated the system on his bank account by increasing the overdraft for his personal gain, and as a result his employer suffered an actual loss of over R1.9 million,” said Gauteng Hawks spokesperson Warrant Officer Thatohatsi Mavimbela.
In January, Brink was released on R5,000 during his first court appearance. The matter was postponed to February 3, 2026, and was remanded to the Palm Ridge Specialised Commercial Crimes Court.
The Hawks said investigations into the matter are continuing.
Last year, IOL reported that a 38-year-old former bank employee, Rachel Tsakani Bloko, appeared in the Polokwane Magistrate’s Court after being arrested for fraud involving more than R130,000.
Limpopo police spokesperson Brigadier Hlulani Mashaba said Bloko allegedly siphoned the money by fraudulently applying for loans in the names of unsuspecting clients.
“The suspect allegedly used the personal credentials of bank clients without their knowledge to apply for personal loans for herself. The victims only became aware of the loans after the bank informed them of unsettled accounts,” Mashaba said at the time.
A warrant of arrest was issued, and Bloko was taken into custody. The case was investigated by the provincial commercial crime investigation unit.
She appeared in court on Tuesday, where she was granted R5,000 bail.
Sibusiso Lucky Mahlalela (45) was sentenced on 29 January 2026 for the murder of his female friend Pretty Fikile Mokone.
The incident occurred in the early hours of 11 August 2024 at Sinqobile Village, Barberton. Mahlalela and Mokone were in a domestic relationship and lived together. On the day in question, the couple was returning home from a tavern when Mahlalela received a phone call from an unknown person. An argument ensued after Mokone accused him of infidelity.
During the altercation, Mahlalela assaulted Mokone, striking her multiple times with a wooden plank. The couple later returned to their residence, where Mokone complained of severe headaches and indicated that she would seek medical assistance at a nearby clinic the following day.
While on their way to the clinic, Mokone requested water, which Mahlalela went to fetch. Upon his return, he found her lying unresponsive on the ground. Mahlalela concealed Mokone’s body in nearby bushes for the remainder of the day and only reported the incident to the police the following morning. He later confessed to the assault and was arrested and the case was investigated by Detective Sergeant Standford Gumede.
In court, Mahlalela pleaded not guilty, claiming that he had no intention to kill the deceased. However, the State presented compelling evidence. This evidence was corroborated by photographic exhibits and a post-mortem report, which confirmed that Mokone died as a result of multiple injuries sustained during the assault.
The court rejected Mahlalela’s version and found him guilty of murder.
The next stop for the man accused of murdering a former Plettenberg Bay detective may be a psychiatric hospital.
Driftwood artist Bevan van Druten appeared briefly in the Plettenberg Bay Magistrate’s Court on Thursday, appearing calm in the dock while carrying a Bible.
A new prosecutor, Cameron Roode, came on record.
He told the court Van Druten, 53, faced a Schedule 6 murder charge for the killing of his girlfriend, Anneke “Nicky” van Heerden, and that bail would be opposed.
The Schedule 6 charge indicates that Van Druten must prove exceptional circumstances for bail to be granted.
The appearance had also brought a change on the bench, with magistrate Stephan Lourens having taken over the matter.
Roode said the state believed violence was implicit in the case.
He said Van Druten could potentially interfere with witnesses if released, as many were known to him.
He also asked that Van Druten be sent to Valkenberg Psychiatric Hospital for observation.
The district surgeon had also submitted an affidavit.
Van Druten handed himself over to police in the early hours of Monday last week, just hours after the 54-year-old’s body had been found on a dune, allegedly lying next to his bakkie.
Police spokesperson Sergeant Wesley Twigg reported that her body was found with multiple injuries.
His legal aid attorney told the court the defence needed time to take instructions from Van Druten, including on the state’s application for psychiatric evaluation.
The case has been postponed until next Friday to allow for further instructions to be gathered and to continue the bail proceedings.
2026.1.31 Biko Inquest Set to Resume at Gqeberha High Court on 20 February
Families and activists across South Africa are watching closely as the re-opened inquest into the tragic death of anti-apartheid hero Steve Bantu Biko gears up to continue next month.
The matter, which has stirred deep emotions and calls for long-overdue justice, was discussed in chambers on Friday, 30 January 2026, paving the way for proceedings to resume at the Gqeberha High Court on 20 February 2026, where final case management issues will be wrapped up.
Who Was Steve Bantu Biko?
Steve Bantu Biko remains one of the most inspiring figures in South Africa’s fight against apartheid.
Agrizzi cut a deal with the state to avoid imprisonment for being part of a corrupt syndicate.
Former Bosasa CEO Angelo Agrizzi has testified in the corruption case against Sondolo IT company director Trevor Mathenjwa.
In November 2025, Agrizzi cut a deal with the state to avoid imprisonment for being part of a corrupt syndicate that bribed officials, including ministers.
In return, he had to provide honest testimony to the National Prosecuting Authority (NPA).
Corruption
Mathenjwa allegedly received R600,000 in kickbacks through his security systems company, intended for upgrades to the security systems at the home of the late former SAA board chairperson, Dudu Myeni.
During proceedings of the Bosasa-linked corruption case against Mathenjwa before the Johannesburg High Court, the state led its evidence through Agrizzi and four other key witnesses.
“The defence has started its cross-examination of Agrizzi on his testimony. The matter was postponed to 07 April 2026 for the continuation of cross-examination,” the NPA’s Investigating Directorate Against Corruption (IDAC) spokesperson Henry Mamothame said.
Bribes
Agrizzi was charged in a R1.8 billion corruption case where he is said to have paid bribes to government officials in exchange for lucrative contracts.
The contracts were awarded by the Department of Correctional Services (DCS) between August 2004 and 2007, for rendering catering and training services, installation of CCTV cameras, installation of perimeter fencing and supplying a CCTV system and monitoring equipment at prisons.
Poor health
The case has faced several delays due to Agrizzi’s apparent ill-health as well as finances related to the legal representation of some of the accused.
Agrizzi was sentenced to 10 years for each count of corruption and 10 years for money laundering. The sentences, however, were suspended for five years, meaning he won’t spend any time in jail.
Agrizzi, now in poor health and on an oxygen machine most of the time, initially offered to assist the state back in 2019, but that offer was spurned.
—
The case against Armindo Joaquim Pacula, the 25-year-old Mozambican linked to the alleged murder of popular DJ Warras, was postponed to February 9 for the verification of his immigration status and personal details.
Pacula appeared briefly before the Johannesburg Magistrate’s Court on Monday.
Pacula is facing charges that include murder, conspiracy to commit murder, and contravention of the Immigration Act. DJ Warras was reportedly killed in connection with ongoing disputes associated with the security company’s operations involving hijacked buildings.
Stock was gunned down in the Johannesburg CBD on 16 December in what is believed to have been a hit linked to work being done by his security company in relation to hijacked buildings.
Pacula was arrested on Friday evening during a crime intelligence operation at the Marathon informal settlement in Primrose, Ekurhuleni.
State Prosecutor Vincent Mochabela highlighted the complexities surrounding Pacula’s situation, indicating the State’s opposition to his bail application.
He further expressed concerns regarding Pacula’s questionable immigration status, saying, “The accused’s address remains unclear, and no passport for verification has been provided.”
Meanwhile, Pacula’s co-accused Victor Majola, 44, is scheduled to return to court on February 11 after he was denied bail by the same court.
During Majola’s bail hearing last month, the defence argued that the State had failed to present evidence directly linking Majola to the crime, while Mochabela requested that the court deny Majola bail. He argued that the accused was likely to evade trial.
2026.1.16 DJ Warras murder case: Defence makes fresh bid to submit new evidence
Mabunda says reopening the defence case would not prejudice the state in any way.
Victor Mthethwa Majola’s attorney, Dumisani Mabunda, started proceedings on Friday with an application to reopen the case after presenting his closing arguments on Thursday.
This comes after the court on Thursday denied Mabunda’s request for the state to provide video footage in its possession that it intends to use as evidence in the case.
Majola appeared in the Johannesburg Magistrate’s Court on Friday for his bail application.
The court was supposed to hear the state’s closing arguments in the bail application of Majola in the murder case of Warrick “DJ Warras” Stock.
‘New evidence’ in Majola’s favour
However, Mabunda said he had obtained new evidence that might assist his client in the bail application.
“Before the state process, I just need to please address the court. Your worship, I want to bring an application to actually reopen the case based on new evidence of video footage that we want to actually help this court with,” said Mabunda.
“This footage is actually from third parties. Your worship, we do not know whether that video footage is in the state’s possession. But as far as the court is concerned, your worship, it’s reliable footage that is in possession of Eyewitness News.”
Magistrate Annalise Tlhapi asked: “Is it reliable, and from what you said, you are not sure. So I want to say to you, is it a reliable source, and is it the same as what the state had?”
“Your worship, we don’t know what video footage the state has since the court decided that particular video footage was not necessary for these proceedings. So now, as we have always maintained, it is a matter of public interest,” responded Mabunda.
“In reopening the case, the court can actually look into evidence that is presented by a third party as long as we show that that particular footage is relevant, is material and is weighted to this case. And as far as I’m concerned, your worship, you don’t necessarily have to deal with the basic requirements in terms of normal trial proceedings. So in this instance, if the court is satisfied, we can bring it over just to satisfy the court on balance of probabilities, if there are exceptional circumstances in the interest of justice.”
‘Something new’
Magistrate Tlhapi lamented that the defence always seemed to file new applications immediately after closing its arguments, further delaying the proceedings.
“It seems each and every time on the next day of postponement, you always have something new,” said the magistrate.
“When I was asking you during your application, you said you’re done, you don’t have any further evidence, and every day you always bring something new.”
“It’s new evidence that was presented to me by a third party with a date of yesterday. Yesterday I spent the whole afternoon at court. I only found out about this late in the evening. It has a date of yesterday, late in the evening. And when I look at it, this is relevant for a bail application. The court will have to make a determination,” Mabunda responded.
“I don’t want to interrupt you, but do you agree with me? On the first application, you brought your application, then you closed your case. The following day, while I was expecting the state to proceed, you said you were not done, and you brought an address. Then we postponed. Today is another one,” said the magistrate.
“But isn’t it our right, your worship, to request or to bring an application to reopen the case at any stage? Before the court makes a judgment on the matter. As long as it gives satisfactory and compelling reasons to the court as to why the court should consider this footage. This footage is in the public eye. It’s there for everyone to see,” responded Mabunda.
State says no to Mabunda
State prosecutor Vincent Mochabela objected to the application, saying the defence should have obtained all its evidence before the case commenced.
“Well-experienced attorneys, before they start with their paid application, they may make sure that they investigate their case thoroughly, gather all the information. Before they can begin the paid application, gather all required information,” argued Mochabela.
“So in this one matter, my learned friend, all the time, he closes the case all the time, then supplementary evidence. New evidence. And therefore, the state requests that the court dismiss the defence’s request.
“We didn’t fail to produce video footage. The video footage is in the lab. At this stage, it is not readily available. Furthermore, my learned colleague says he is not sure whether the footage he has is the same as that the state has. So we are just going to deal with the thing which he is not sure about.”
However, Mabunda said reopening the defence case would not prejudice the state in any way.
“The law allows me to reopen or to bring an application or a request for the defence case to be opened before the court can make a decision or judgment on the matter. Nothing stops me from doing that. It is only for this court to decide,” he said.
The magistrate granted the defence’s request.
She further warned Mabunda that the state may also use the new evidence against Majola at a later stage.
—
2026.1.3 Fourth Arrest, R500 Bail: Questions Raised Over Justice System Leniency, Serial Phone Snatcher Nobert Zapambela Released
Johannesburg, South Africa – A man notorious for snatching phones in busy city streets has once again walked free on minimal bail, sparking fresh outrage over what many see as a lenient justice system.
Nobert Zapambela, a 26-year-old Zimbabwean national, was arrested for the fourth time in late December 2025 after a viral video showed him targeting a woman in Pretoria.
Released on just R500 bail despite his history of theft, the case has left communities frustrated and fearful, wondering if repeat offenders like him will ever face real consequences.
For everyday people walking the streets of Johannesburg or Pretoria with their phones in hand, this feels like a direct threat to their safety, as Zapambela’s quick grabs have become a chilling reminder of how vulnerable one can be in public.
Families who have lost valuables or felt the fear of being targeted share stories of helplessness, calling for tougher bail rules to keep dangerous criminals off the streets.
As 2026 begins, this release has ignited debates about justice in South Africa, where over 200,000 theft cases are reported yearly, many involving repeat offenders who slip through the system.
Police confirm Zapambela’s links to a syndicate including three Bangladeshi nationals, raising alarms about organised crime rings preying on unsuspecting victims.
With no stricter measures in place, residents worry this leniency only emboldens thieves, leaving ordinary folk to look over their shoulders in a country already battling high crime rates.
Zapambela’s pattern of arrests and quick releases has frustrated law enforcement and communities alike, turning him into a symbol of a system that seems to favour the criminal over the victim.
As details of his crimes emerge, the call grows louder for changes that protect the public and deliver real justice.
The Viral Video That Led to the Latest Arrest
The most recent chapter in Zapambela’s criminal saga began with a chilling video that spread like wildfire on social media in December 2025.
The footage, captured in Brooklyn, Pretoria, showed a man – later identified as Zapambela – walking behind a woman before swiftly snatching her phone and fleeing the scene.
The clip, which amassed thousands of views within hours, prompted a wave of online sleuthing from concerned citizens who helped pinpoint his identity.
This was not an isolated incident.
Similar videos from Johannesburg and other areas surfaced, depicting Zapambela using the same tactic: Approaching victims from behind in crowded streets, grabbing devices, and vanishing into the throng.
His method relied on speed and surprise, often targeting women or distracted pedestrians in busy urban spots like malls or sidewalks.
The viral nature of these clips turned public pressure into action, leading Johannesburg Metro Police Department (JMPD) officers to track him down to a flat in Hillbrow where he was hiding on a balcony.
The arrest unfolded dramatically, with Zapambela found in the company of three Bangladeshi nationals believed to be part of a larger phone-snatching syndicate.
This group operated across Pretoria and Johannesburg, fencing stolen devices on the black market for quick cash.
Police recovered evidence linking them to multiple thefts, but despite the mounting cases, Zapambela’s release on R500 bail has left many questioning if the system is equipped to handle repeat offenders.
Zapambela’s Criminal History: A Pattern of Thefts and Releases
This marks Zapambela’s fourth arrest for theft in South Africa, a record that has fuelled public anger over what seems like endless catch-and-release.
His first known brush with the law came in early 2024 in Pretoria, where he was caught in a similar phone-snatching incident and released on bail.
By mid-2025, he faced charges again in Johannesburg for targeting shoppers in malls, only to be let out on low bail once more.
Court records show a consistent pattern: Quick arrests followed by minimal penalties that allow him back on the streets. In one case from October 2025, he was linked to a Brooklyn Pretoria snatching but walked free after posting bail.
Critics point to this leniency as a failure of the justice system, where overcrowded courts and backlogs lead to rushed decisions that prioritise decongesting jails over public safety.
Zapambela’s operations often involved accomplices, like the Bangladeshi nationals arrested with him in his latest bust.
This syndicate specialised in high-traffic areas, using distraction techniques to grab phones, wallets, or bags before disappearing.
Victims report not just financial loss – phones can cost R10,000 or more – but also emotional trauma from feeling violated in public spaces.
Public Outrage: Calls for Tougher Bail and Sentencing
The low R500 bail has ignited fury among South Africans, who see it as a slap in the face for victims of theft.
Social media buzzes with comments like “How many more arrests before he stays locked up?” and “Our justice system is broken.” Many feel the amount – less than the value of a stolen phone – mocks the seriousness of repeat offending.
Communities in Hillbrow and Pretoria, where Zapambela operated, express fear of his return. One resident said: “We can’t feel safe knowing he’s out again.”
Advocacy groups push for bail reforms, like denying it for serial offenders or setting higher amounts based on crime history. In 2025, over 200,000 theft cases nationwide went unsolved or saw light punishments, fuelling this discontent.
Political voices join in, calling for stricter laws. The DA and EFF have highlighted similar cases, demanding reviews of bail policies to protect the public.
The Justice System’s Challenges: Why Leniency Persists
South Africa’s courts face massive backlogs – over 200,000 cases pending in 2025 – leading to rushed bail hearings where low-risk assessments favour release.
For non-violent crimes like theft, bail is often low to avoid overcrowding jails that hold 150,000 inmates against capacity for 100,000.
Repeat offenders slip through due to poor record-keeping or lenient magistrates.
In Gauteng, where Zapambela’s crimes occurred, 40 percent of theft suspects reoffend while on bail. Reforms in 2025 included digital tracking, but rollout lags.
For immigrants like Zapambela, deportation debates arise, but legal rights apply.
This case fuels talks on balancing justice with human rights, especially for foreigners accused of crimes.
Prevention Tips: Staying Safe from Phone Snatchers
To avoid falling victim, experts share simple habits.
Keep phones in secure pockets or bags, not hands, in crowds. Use anti-theft apps that track devices if stolen. Walk in groups or well-lit areas, and stay alert to followers.
Report thefts quick – in 2025, over 50,000 phones were recovered through police ops targeting syndicates. Community watches in Hillbrow have cut snatches by 20 percent with extra eyes on streets.
For 2026, tech like fingerprint locks or insurance adds protection. Awareness campaigns in schools teach kids too, building safer habits early.
Path Forward: Hope for Change in 2026
As Zapambela’s case heads to court, victims hope for stiffer bail rules. His fourth arrest could push for laws treating serial theft as serious, with no-bail options.
Communities can lead change with neighbourhood patrols and tip lines. In Johannesburg, 2025 initiatives like these cut thefts by 15 percent.
For South Africa, this highlights needs for faster courts and better rehab for offenders. By fixing leniency, we build safer streets for all.
If you spot suspicious activity, report it – your action could prevent the next theft.
2026.1.2 Suspects in Viral East London Security Guard Assault Released on Warning, Set to Appear in Court
East London, Eastern Cape – Two suspects captured on camera brutally assaulting a security guard at eBuhlanti Marina Glen Beachfront have been released on warning after their swift arrest, Eastern Cape police have confirmed.
The incident, which sparked widespread outrage on social media following the circulation of the footage, occurred on New Year’s Eve 2025 when the guard reportedly asked the group to move their improperly parked vehicle.
The duo now faces charges of common assault and is scheduled to appear in the East London Magistrate’s Court on January 7, 2026.
As investigations continue, authorities have indicated that further arrests and additional charges remain possible.
This case has highlighted ongoing concerns about public safety at popular beachfront spots during festive periods, prompting calls for increased security measures.
The viral video, which quickly amassed thousands of views, shows the suspects punching and kicking the guard, drawing condemnation from netizens and officials alike.
Acting Provincial Commissioner Major General Thandiswa Kupiso praised the rapid response of law enforcement, emphasising the importance of community vigilance in reporting such incidents.
The Assault Incident and Viral Footage
The attack unfolded at eBuhlanti Marina Glen, a well-known recreational area in East London, where the security guard was performing his duties to ensure visitor safety.
According to eyewitness accounts shared online, the confrontation began when the guard approached the suspects and requested they relocate their vehicle, which was obstructing the road near the beach.
The situation escalated rapidly, with the men allegedly assaulting the guard physically.
The footage, captured by bystanders and shared widely on platforms like Facebook and X (formerly Twitter), depicts the brutal beating, leading to the suspects’ quick identification and arrest.
Provincial police spokesperson Brigadier Nobuntu Gantana confirmed the details, stating: “The duo was swiftly arrested after footage of the brutal assault circulated online.”
No further information on the suspects’ identities or the guard’s condition has been released, as the investigation remains active.
Arrest, Release on Warning, and Court Proceedings
Following the video’s spread, police acted promptly, arresting the two men on charges of common assault.
They were processed and released on warning on January 1, 2026, a decision that has raised questions among some community members about the handling of violent offences.
Gantana explained: “They were processed and released on warning on January 1, 2026. They are scheduled to appear in the East London Magistrate’s Court on January 7, 2026.”
The release on warning means the suspects must adhere to specific conditions, such as not contacting the victim or committing further offences, pending their court date.
Police have emphasised that the probe is ongoing, with Brigadier Gantana adding: “The investigation is ongoing, and further arrests are possible. No further information is available for release.”
Acting Provincial Commissioner Kupiso commended the officers involved:
“The prompt action of law enforcement officers that led to the arrests” demonstrates the commitment to maintaining order, especially during high-traffic holiday periods.
2026.1.1 Fake Prophet Nabbed: Suspect Linked to 8 Graveyard Rapes Across Free State
“The forensic evidence links him to crimes dating back as far as 1999,” Kareli said.
A 55-year-old man who allegedly posed as a prophet to prey on women has been arrested and linked to eight rape and robbery cases spanning more than two decades in the Free State.
Police believe the suspect targeted victims in Welkom, Thabong and Bloemfontein, using graveyards as hunting grounds and claiming to “cleanse” women before attacking them.
Fake Prophet Suspect Caught After Graveyard Attack in Bloemfontein
Free State police spokesperson Sergeant Mahlomola Kareli said the suspect’s run from the law came to an end after he allegedly attacked a 21-year-old woman in Bloemfontein.
“The suspect’s run from the law ended recently after he allegedly attacked a 21-year-old female victim,” Kareli said on Thursday.
The victim was walking home through the Magengenene graveyard when she was attacked and raped. Community members intervened, apprehended the suspect and handed him over to Mangaung police.
Victims ‘Cleansed’ Before Being Raped and Robbed
Police allege the suspect used a disturbing modus operandi.
According to Kareli, once inside the graveyard, the man would persuade victims to undress under the pretence of performing a cleansing ritual.
He allegedly cut the victims’ hair and burned it on a nearby grave before raping them. He would then rob them of their cellphones, claiming that “witches” could use the devices to track them.
DNA Links Suspect to Crimes Dating Back to 1999
Through detective work and DNA profiling, police have now linked the suspect to seven additional cases of rape and robbery — five in Mangaung and two in Welkom.
“The forensic evidence links him to crimes dating back as far as 1999,” Kareli said.
Police records indicate the suspect was out on parole when he allegedly resumed his criminal activities in 2022.
“The recent graveyard attack marks the eighth case now officially tied to his name,” Kareli added.
Police Appeal for More Victims to Come Forward
The suspect is expected to appear in the Bloemfontein Magistrate’s Court soon, where he will face multiple charges of rape and robbery.
Police believe there may be more victims who have not yet reported their cases.
Anyone who may have been victimised in a similar manner is urged to contact Detective Sergeant Bessie Nthoba on 082 886 8979, call Crime Stop on 08600 10111, or report to their nearest police station.
发表回复